The professionals fighting it deserve intelligence that is honest, verified, and free of commercial interference. The Roundtable exists to provide it.
Every industry report and benchmark in financial crime is funded by someone with a commercial interest in the findings. Survey panels are self-selected volunteers. Results are shaped by who chose to respond, not by what the profession actually thinks.
The Economic Crime Roundtable is different. Our panel is verified — every member admitted by peer nomination and democratic vote. Participation is mandatory — that is what membership means. Our funding comes from subscribers who pay for access to findings they cannot control.
The result is intelligence you can trust: what the profession actually thinks about AI adoption, regulatory readiness, workforce transformation, and the threats that keep practitioners awake at night.
Individual attribution is technically impossible — not policy-prohibited, technically impossible. That is why practitioners tell us things they cannot say anywhere else.
Governed by stewards drawn from across the profession. Members vote on platform direction. The community owns its intelligence.
Financial crime practitioners make financial services safer for everyone. This community exists to recognise, support, and amplify that work.
No vendor has ever paid for a favourable finding. No vendor ever will. Our funding model structurally prevents it.
Every question validated by multiple AI models for bias and ambiguity. AAPOR-compliant methodology. Full transparency on limitations.
Practitioners from consultancies, vendors, and technology firms are welcome — their cross-organisational experience is invaluable. Commercial promotion of any kind is not.
Quarterly survey across 7 sections — AI adoption, vendor intelligence, workforce, governance, risk landscape, cooperation, professional identity. Mandatory for all members.
Topic-specific surveys open to all practitioners. Lighter, more frequent, with instant results distribution. Your perspective earns you the community's perspective in return.
Five-question daily quiz testing real regulatory knowledge — not trivia. Immediate scoring with explanations and statutory references. Build your streak.
Everything feeds the collective intelligence: quizzes reveal knowledge gaps, surveys surface sentiment, contributions build the profession's knowledge base.
The verified panel. Nominated by peers, admitted by vote. Full access to Pulse, Compass personal report, Panel Intelligence, typology authoring, and governance. Participation in The Pulse is mandatory — that commitment is what makes the data real.
The wider practitioner network. Free, by invitation. Access to surveys, daily quizzes, Skills Signal, Associate Voice, and partner events. Pathway to full membership through active contribution.
Operational custodians drawn from the profession. Responsible for panel integrity, survey quality, community standards, and subscriber briefings. Bound by a published Code of Ethics.
The distinction is not where someone works but why they are here. A sanctions specialist at a RegTech vendor who has implemented screening at 15 banks has knowledge the community needs. Their sales colleague who wants to build relationships with prospects does not belong.
Consultants, vendor practitioners, and implementation specialists are welcome and valued — their cross-organisational experience is often richer than any single in-house perspective. But the moment someone uses the platform to promote, recruit, or gather competitive intelligence, they have crossed the line.
Trusted intelligence from the profession, for the profession.